|
From
inflatable suits to pointy hats,
from old cynics to New Romantics. The Boys are back in town and,
says Michael Bracewell, they're
always different, always the same, and permanently in fashion
Friday
July 9, 1999
For
a pop duo who had their first number one hit - West End Girls - back in
1985, Chris Lowe and Neil Tennant, better known as the Pet Shop Boys,
have a knack of remaining constantly modern. Like Gilbert and George,
they have developed a creative partnership which seems to operate beyond
the boundaries of fashionability, and yet remains permanently in fashion.
From such memorable occasions as Chris Lowe wearing an lssey Miyake inflatable
suit while they performed on Saturday Night at the London Palladium -
and refused to wave at the end of the show with the rest of the acts -
to their later collaborations with artist film-makers such as Derek Jarman
and Sam Taylor-Wood, they have always managed to mirror the zeitgeist
while retaining their cultural independence.
To some extent, the enduring relevance of the Pet Shop Boys could be due
to the fact they found their perfect musical identity from the very beginning.
By mixing the sensory rush of luxuriously orchestrated dance music with
an images and lyrical style which was almost its direct opposite, foregrounding
isolation and social commentary, they achieved an originality and acquired
a stance which has simply intensified over the years. With the Pet Shop
Boys, there is nearly always a hidden, sharp edge of critique - of society,
of pop and of themselves - just beneath the lustrous sheen on the surface.
After all, they even managed to cover Village People's Go West with a
Russian constructivist spin.
Now
the Pet Shop Boys are up to business as usual. In this case, holding a
series of interviews in a semi-derelict suite of rooms just beneath the
highly ornate, neo-Gothic eaves of the old St Pancras Station Hotel. The
hotel has been empty for nearly a decade - although the Spice Girls filmed
their video for Wannabe here - and this interview has been presented as
a kind of eerie performance piece with touches of science-fiction.
Summoned up the five dusty flights of the abandoned ceremonial staircase,
a tape-recording of barking dogs breaks out high above you. So far, so
New Romantic. Greeted at the top by Dainton, the Pet Shop Boys' friend
and bodyguard, you are then led through a further suite of darkened rooms,
at the end of which is a projection of the Pet Shop Boys' latest video.
When you finally get to Tennant and Lowe, they are sitting on an illuminated
glass floor inspired by Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey, and wearing matching
Versace bomber jackets made out of a gold metallic fabric designed to
retain every crease and wrinkle. They look like off-duty astronauts.
"If you had this floor in your house," announces Tennant, suddenly
domestic in the midst of the Gothic-Futurist ambience, "and it was
taken away, you'd really miss it. Everything would look really drab, because
it gives off a lovely light. It's actually quite warm and contemplative."
He looks around the floor again, for all the world like a customer in
Habitat or the Conran shop, choosing interior lighting.
Tennant and Lowe are here to promote their new single, with its classic
Pet Shop Boys title, I Don't Know What You Want But I Can't Give It Anymore.
This single is a mesmerically spooky disco stomper, which has a lyric
about paranoia, surveillance and infidelity, but a snare-drum and hi-hat
backbeat which sounds as though it was lifted off a Barry White track.
It is one of those potent configurations of opposites which the Pet Shop
Boys have made their speciality. In addition to this, they have developed
a new images for the video which you could call Boot Boy Samurai Chic.
As a look, this new images just manages to ride that perilously tight
back curve of style which Eddie Izzard identified as connecting "fantastically
hip" with "totally naff". What makes it succeed, ultimately,
is the fact that the Pet Shop Boys have pushed it to the very limit: scary
gold-haired wigs showing dark roots, heavy black eyebrows of the kind
last seen on Siouxsie Sioux in about 1981, spider-thin dark glasses which
lend an air of complete blankness to the features, and striped culottes
which hang like ankle-length skirts. Gothic interiors, men in skirts and
synthesisers - it has to be New Romantic.
"I
do think that the video's quite New Romantic," says Neil, "But
New Romanticism worked for such a short period of time, didn't it? And
needless to say David Bowie had the best moment in it by leaping in about
two hours after it all started with the video for Ashes to Ashes. That
really is the ultimate New Romantic video, although there's probably some
good ones by Steve Strange and Visage. I remember when I used to live
in a flat in the King's Road, and I happened to open the door one day
just as Steve Strange walked past. He was wearing Look Number Three, which
was when he had a beard and sat on cushions. It was his Cushions Period,
but I always remember it as quite exciting."
"There's
not enough of that, these days, is there?" adds Chris Lowe, as though
remarking on the demise of corner shops. "The King's Road used to
be fantastic."
"If I had the nerve," Neil confides, "I'd walk up and down
the King's Road dressed like we are in our video. Secretly, I'd quite
like to do that. But it takes too long to put the wig on..."
"But that was the whole point," exclaims Chris, "The whole
point of New Romanticism was that it took such a long time to get ready.
That was what you did - get ready."
"I
have to say that I like the bit in the video with the whole ritual of
putting on the costumes. The costumes are a distancing technique - a way
of saying that we're nothing to do with anything else that's happening
in pop," says Neil. "Pop music, these days, is either cheesily
sincere - as in your boy bands - or it's effectively natural-looking,
and we wanted to do something with a level of artifice in it. I always
liked pop that has a sense of wonder about it. I mean, would you rather
see David Bowie on roller skates - like he was in his Day In, Day Out
video - or would you rather see David Bowie dressed as a clown, walking
along the beach at Hastings with a bunch of New Romantics? I know what
I would.
"Also,
the Pet Shop Boys have always been obsessed with not being real, because
we think that's more interesting. I have always thought that the ideal,
for a pop star, is to not be able to believe that they're real. Which
is why I think it was brilliant that Elvis never performed in Britain.
Actually, to their credit, the pop gossip columnist of the Sun suggested
that all the interviewers should be dressed like we are in the video."
"But it can also look grotesque," Chris points out. "No.
It really wasn't designed for daily wear," Neil agrees. "It
was designed like our pointy hats look a few years ago, to be seen through
an electronic medium. We did the pointy hat in real life, just once, when
we launched MTV in Russia. When we came out to do the press conference
we discovered that the ceiling of the room was too low for the hats, and
then when I sat down the collar of my jacket rode up, so I had to kind
of bend forward. An English audience would have found this hilarious,
and we'd all have had a good laugh. But the Russians just sat there and
stared at us, and then asked all the usual questions as though nothing
was odd. You've got to have a nerve to do this kind of thing, you know.
But when you look at our Pointy Hats video, it's a classic video. It's
an attempt to move away from all the supposed naturalism in pop..."
With their new images, record, and forthcoming tour, the Pet Shop Boys
are presenting, as usual, an entire theatrical package. This time, they
have pulled off the considerable coup of collaborating with the visionary
architect, Zaha Hadid, some of whose buildings have been considered too
radical to be constructed. Lowe is a trained architect and, in the light
of this latest collaboration, you can see how the Pet Shop Boys are continuing
their fascination with presenting artificial environments in which to
perform their songs.
"Actually, the idea came about because Janet Street-Porter had been
walking with Zaha Hadid for her television programme," says Neil,
"And she said, 'Why don't you get Zaha Hadid to design your new musical?'
and we said, 'Because she's an architect and it's a completely different
discipline to designing for the theatre.' But then we were in New York
and I was flicking through a book of Zaha's designs in the Rizzoli bookshop,
and I suddenly saw all of her architectural models as stage sets - wonderful
shapes to walk across while holding a microphone, wearing a ludicrous
costume and having a wind machine on you maybe.
"So
we approached her, and I have to say that she and her operation have been
inspiring to work with. They take all the practicalities of a rock show
on board, and they are the only people we have ever worked with who take
the budget seriously. They are working on a modular set which can evolve
during the show and be adapted to different sizes of venue. Which means
that the backing singers are going to be doing some heavy lifting, only
they don't know that yet..."
So
what does all of this new look mean? Or does it mean anything? To judge
from the exterior shots of the video, and the extreme styling of their
new images, they are positioning themselves in a vision of the future
in which the architectural brutalism of the 70s has become as weathered
as the Victorian neo-Gothicism of Sir George Gilbert Scott's St Pancras
Hotel. It is, perhaps, the idea of the future itself appearing antique
and old-fashioned, with every adult and child dressed, as revealed at
the end of the video, in the extraordinary Samurai chic which we had assumed
was a sub-cult gang costume - like the Droogs in A Clockwork Orange -
rather than the mark of complete social conformity.
"There is a comment about conformity," says Neil, "But
I think that if our previous shows were paintings, they would have been
figurative. Whereas this one is definitely abstract. Unlike our other
shows, this doesn't have a narrative, however loose. I think that it is
possible for pop music to get over-intellectualised but, on the other
hand, it probably isn't intellectualised enough. In the late 70s and early
80s, pop was definitely intellectualised and, interestingly enough, there
was a lot of good music around at the same time. These days, you'd get
embarrassed to start talking about art or writing in pop because people
might think you're being pretentious, which is a really sad pay-off to
the whole laddish thing in the 90s ..."
"Like Bowie gets ridiculed for wanting to be interested in new things."
says Chris, "but we're always looking for a new underground..."
Which could be a definition of the Pet Shop Boys.
The
Pet Shop Boys single is released on July 19, the album follows in the
autumn. Their tour starts on December.
July
1999: The Times
|